Aggregate planning in manufacturing and aggregate planning in services Assignment

Aggregate formulation in manufacturing and aggregate planning in services - Assignment ExampleCompanies dealing in manufacturing processes design a variety of strategies. The most common method actings are the Level plans or the Chase strategies (Maropoulos, McKay & Bramall, 2002). The Chase method entails corresponding capacity and demand depending on the market situations. This method triggers a significant movement of compassionate resource, increased costs associated with inventory carriage and labor union issues associated with human resource movement. This method ensures tokenish inventory levels, saving large sums of money for the comp either. The Level method entails a constant production level, non dependent on the demand levels in the market. Companies that apply this method, therefore, maintain a constant employment rate. Organizations are, therefore, sufficient to control inventory depending on market demand forecasts or future anticipations.Service provision does n ot involve tangible goods and, therefore, does not involve inventory accumulation. Organizations that provide services do not carry the luxury of adjusting their inventories in periods of low or high demand. Therefore, services are regarded as fragile or consumables, whereby the services available but unused are regarded as wasted. A good example is in the transport industry, where companies offer bus services between destinations. An empty seat cannot be sold to another(prenominal) individual at a later period, and therefore considered as wasted.Aggregate planning is best desirable for the manufacturing industry because organizations have the capability to create, hold and put up for sale stock at any period. On the other hand, aggregate planning in service provision varies significantly because services cannot be stocked. Both the capacity and the demand for service provision are difficult to assess and predict respectively. aim is regarded as the most limiting factor in servic e